<p>drew - your response is indignant, completely erroneous, and entirely biased. </p>
<p>"The students that go to these grad schools, for the most part, have always been the creme de la creme. They could easily and have gotten accepted to top schools, ivy leagues...probably even HMC"</p>
<p>How many people are we talking about here? What is your sample size? Lets post some stats about Morehouse...</p>
<p>SAT Verbal: 470-580
SAT Math: 470-590</p>
<p>20% top 10% in HS class</p>
<p>67% Acceptance Rate</p>
<p>Avg GPA: 3.24</p>
<p>These stats are basically the same as any lower level state school in the US. You are telling me that Morehouse differs from University of Idaho? Dont you think plenty of intelligent, driven students end up at Idaho for one reason or another. There are countless reasons that explain why top students attend mediocre colleges...this does not attest to the quality of those institutions. You seem to be very touchy on the subject of Morehouse and AA. Frankly, the top students (meaning top 10%) at Morehouse wouldnt have gotten into any ivy without AA. The same holds true for grad school. I dont understand why you are listing all of the grad schools your peers were accepted into...this proves no point due to the existence of AA...in fact, it demonstrates the awesome presence of AA. The bottom line is that Morehouse is only on this list because of AA, simple as that. However, you believe "They're (statistics) total bullsht" so you might have some trouble with my reasoning. And btw, im sure Harvey Mudd boasts grad school figures that would blow Morehouse out of the water...</p>