<p>Why would it be objective? Explain your reasoning please.</p>
<p>For math, I just remember putting down 171 as the answer for the question about how many numbers have a 0 greater than 99 and less than 1000. And 14 was the answer to the last problem on how far the guy walked (the last grid-in question).</p>
<p>I put objective but I think I was wrong b/c none were objective. As for overly alarmist , hmmm.I don’t know… I couldn’t decide…
I didn’t get 171 but I did get 14. Did anyone get 166 for any thing on the math?</p>
<p>It has to be 171. There are 19 numbers in each hundred (100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,120,130,140,150,160,170,180, and 190). Nine hundreds so 19*9=171.</p>
<p>why umm? Oracular was correct. I hate myself. 800 cr last year and this yearI can’t even discern the meaning of simple voc words.
Tally of wrong voc questions so far
1-oracular 2-playful 3- overly alarmist?</p>
<p>U got a 22 for the math numbers with the square and the little squares.</p>
<p>Oh, and 2.5$ for 60 pounds- anyone get that one:?</p>
<p>but seriously, for the tone question
the second passage was obviously defiant
and for the first, wasn’t that last sentence defiant?
something snoot/snob (forgot the word) and dysphemisn</p>