<p>Yep. Coalition was the right answer to that question.</p>
<p>for writing, choosing the wrong part, number 1</p>
<p>When the scientist first started studying chimpanzees in the 1960s, she ____ criticized for calling chimpanzees by name rather than species (something like that)</p>
<p>the blank was wrong right?</p>
<p>now we gotta wake months for our scores …</p>
<p>umm
anyone want to predict the curve?</p>
<p>1) In the reading about African conservation where it asked to refer back to the quote with “two centuries ago…”, where the natives used to live together with the wild, but now they percieve it as threats, did the correct answer include something about “natural order”?</p>
<p>2) In the writing section, finding errors, there was the question: Experience “having” taught…“to plant”…was a waste…".
I wasn’t sure about “having” and “to plant”, but I picked “having”.</p>
<p>3$ for the can of corn question?</p>
<p>i put HAS for the plant question</p>
<p>any other hard writing questions?
i am sure there are A LOT more but i was in too much of a hurry i forgot what i answered. lol</p>
<p>The passage of the writing: what to insert in the beginning of the sentence 6?</p>
<p>what was sentence 6 about
a few answers i got were</p>
<p>although it was similar to the book (something around that)</p>
<p>ppl did not understand the difficulty of making a successful movie</p>
<p>$2.50 for the can of corn.</p>
<p>No, I dont think its ppl did not understand the difficulty of making a movie.</p>
<p>EDIT: It was something else, I believe.</p>
<p>
I think it will be normal for math and writing, but generous for critical reading. Am I the only one that thought the first CR section was tough?</p>
<p>it was something like: no matter how suitable a book is for adaption…</p>
<p>yea one option had northeastern coast’s climate. is it right though. and so factitious is definitely wrong?</p>
<p>alot of ppl put factitious as their answer but it seems that oracular is a better answer</p>
<p>I think it was factitious. Factitious means artificial or derived. Factitious makes sense because it would mean the predictions were derived. But then again, oracular sounds like it might work too. Oracular has a lot of meanings: obscure, as if divinely inspired, having characteristics of an oracle…etc… But to me factitious (not spontaneous or natural; artificial; contrived) makes more sense. In the context, I think it would mean that the guy’s predictions were so uncannily accurate, that the workers thought they were “not natural” or “contrived”.</p>
<p>Did you guys put “prattle” for the vocab question about the guy speaking foolishly and his name becoming a byname?</p>
<p>And in the writing section was it “Due to his failure to improve the city’s fiscal problem, the mayor was not elected” or was it “because of his failure…” </p>
<p>And the one about workers going on strike. Was it “The changes to the insurance plan have so angered the workers that they threatened a general strike” or was it “the changes angered the workers, threatening a general strike”?</p>
<p>In california, the cut off is 218, I think. Do you guys know about how many one can miss to make the cut off?</p>
<p>i thought it was oracular…cause it means like having hidden knowledge or being wise or something like that</p>
<p>for the writing question about workers threatening to strike, was it:</p>
<p>They have so angered the workers that they have threatened general strike</p>
<p>or was it</p>
<p>They have angered the workers to threaten general strike.</p>
<p>
I’d like to disagree with the previous posters on this one. If you say the latter then you’re implying that the climate is a direct subset of the United States when it is not; it is the northeastern coast that is the subset of the US and while it’s not exactly parallel to Japan’s climate it is not gramatically incorrect.</p>
<p>
Wouldn’t it be oracular? Factitious means fake, artificial; oracular is essentially literally defined as prophetic.</p>
<p>The answer was definitely “oracular”</p>
<p>From the questions that have been discussed, some other answers that I put: objective, overly alarmed, 171, 14</p>
<p>I answered “They have so angered the workers that they have threatened general strike” - The second option doesn’t make sense.</p>
<p>Also, what did you guys get for the numberline inequality problem? </p>
<p>I put abs(x-4)=5</p>