<p>I have taken 2 Sat2s, US History 780 and Math2 780.</p>
<p>I don't want to go to Harvard, Georgetown, or Princeton which are the main schools that still require 3 (mainly because i can't get in) but have looked into other competitive schools like UCLA. I'm thinking of going the pre-med route and major in biology or maybe history. my guidance couselor told me to take three for safety and well-roundedness. </p>
<p>so should i take another, most likely a science? would colleges see all three scores or just two that i would select if i do bad? i have enough time to study for more but if i dont need to i really dont want to.</p>
<p>well, the choice is yours…go through the requirements..of your dream collages..and think if it is really required. If I were you I would have taken 3 for being the better side. My choice would be…MathII, Chemistry/Physics and U.S History/World History/or any other.</p>
<p>but could anybody enlighten me on whether they see the highest 2 or all 3.</p>
<p>and maybe i should make a separate thread but which test would suit me better… biology or physics. i got an A in both (normal/intro) classes but took biology frosh year and it was a joke since my teacher gave out extra credit points weekly, so i just had to squeeze out a B- on the tests for an A overall. i just finished physics last junior year but struggled to keep up and kept my grade because of hw points/extra credit/well written labs but was really inconsistent on tests (A+ then Cs/Ds). </p>
<p>from what ive read on cc, bio is easy to self study for (im taking ap bio senior year if that matters) and physics has a huge curve but people only take it if they have a good background.</p>