<p>"token, you claim that you "deserve" it, but lets face it, if it weren't for affirmative action and you being an athlete, you would be going to neither georgetown or harvard"</p>
<p>If a kid wasn't naturally endowed with intelligence, he couldn't get a 2400
If someone wasn't able to walk independently, he couldn't run track.</p>
<p>Get over yourself. How can you censure someone for being black or for working hard to be a superb athlete then turn around and attribute all of someone's academic prowess to hard work. As if the advantage of being naturally gifted and being black, and thus contributing something that is desirable to the university, are two different things. College is not an award, whether you get in is determined as much by what the college desires as what you can bring to the table. If you don't have what the college is looking for and get rejected, in the end, that's life. Grow, learn, and develop marketable skills so that it is less likely to happen again.
Token might be abrasive, but some of the posters are no less rude or hypocritical. </p>
<p>Decision: Accepted</p>
<p>Stats:</p>
<ul>
<li>SAT: 2240 (710 M, 730 CR, 800M)</li>
<li>SAT IIs: (Math 1c 730, Lit 750, US 770)</li>
<li>GPA: 4.0</li>
<li>Rank: 4/200</li>
<li>Other stats: International award winner, founder of Sony sponsored club, founder of MUN, debater, etc.</li>
</ul>
<p>Subjective:</p>
<ul>
<li>Essays: I thought that they were solid.</li>
<li>Teacher Recs: One was amazing, the other was decent.</li>
<li>Counselor Rec: Told that it was supposed to be something remarkable.</li>
<li>Hook (if any): URM, founder of sponsored club,</li>
</ul>
<p>Location/Person:</p>
<ul>
<li>State or Country: NY</li>
<li>School Type: Public</li>
<li>Ethnicity: Black</li>
<li>Gender:M</li>
</ul>
<p>*Extracurriculars: Check another thread if you care that much =D</p>
<p>*Other Factors: Internets.</p>
<p>*ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Yay.</p>