<p>@Green1997 I put conspicuously because I thought she was trying to show off.</p>
<p>@catchinginfinity I think it was actually “face” instead of “faces” but it’s the same rule</p>
<p>@catchinginfinity
Insolently
Thunderously
Conspicuosly
Rambunctiously and one moree</p>
<p>The tenuous question was the one about MLK</p>
<p>Why would it be </p>
<ol>
<li>Transportation instead of Food Processing</li>
<li>Exasperation instead of Mock amazement</li>
</ol>
<p>@waste - I put transportation and mock.</p>
<p>Transportation because of the fuel issue, but I’m pretty sure mock amazement was correct.</p>
<p>And for the masks question, I’m pretty sure it said masks not mask</p>
<p>@nainaigogo
thanks for the info, hopefully it doesn’t stray away from that much</p>
<p>@WasteOfUsername, Exasperation and mock amazement were different questions. Mock amazement was about the “gee whiz” comment while exasperation was about the feelings of Mr. H toward “the translator!”</p>
<p>does anyone remember the actual question for the city council members question in the writing section? how is it no error? wasnt there some error with ‘being’ or ‘be’ (i think choice D).</p>
<p>Can we all just confirm that colleges CAN’T see this score…</p>
<p>nvm didn’t know that</p>
<p>Oh yeah, anyone remember answer choices for “the translator!” question?</p>
<p>Cool. For the actors writing question, it’s faces</p>
<p>The specimen one was E, correct??</p>
<p>im fairly certain that it was “their face” in the given question</p>
<p>The translators was exasperation</p>
<p>Yeah “their face” was the error</p>
<p>Disbelief or alarm?</p>
<p>@waste - Something else. Can’t remember the exact question, argh. ):</p>