<p>I think blame is to be had on all sides. </p>
<p>I am 25 years old – my parents’ generation was full of people who made a nominal investment in their college education and, which paid off in major ways. Seems like good advice going forward, but when you take into account that the inflation-adjusted cost of attending school has more than tripled and that there are more people these days with college degrees (thus making its competitive advantage less striking)… it becomes less likely that this investment is going to pay off any time soon.</p>
<p>Kids in my generation have been told for years, from people on all sides, that education is of utmost importance because to be without a degree is to shortchange yourself when it comes to your future. You need to work hard, pursue the best grades you can, get into the best school you can, etc. Attending a less prestigious school is somehow seen as a bad thing. Not necessarily harmful advice on its face, but when it fails to take into account financial trends, it very easily becomes bad advice.</p>
<p>High school typically doesn’t come with a personal finance class – so by the time college choices roll around, kids make decisions when they are the least-equipped to understand the tradeoffs. You’ve got parents condoning hefty loans, financial aid officers telling you “Oh, yes, that’ll be affordable, no worries,” and lenders actually approving the loans. It can be very difficult for the uneducated borrower to intuit that they may be making the wrong choice and that there isn’t necessarily a safety net embedded in the system for preventing bad investment decisions. Even if a kid strikes out to resolve his/her own ignorance by learning more about the finances, there’s bad advice and misinformation all over the place.</p>
<p>It becomes even harder when you constantly hear that top employers use college degrees as proxies for determining whether a candidate is worth interviewing, since there is simply not enough manpower for a firm to interview EVERYONE who applies for a particular position.</p>
<p>Lastly, many students, who ARE aware of the numbers, have no reference point for them. How much is too much? $10k? $20k? $40k? $50k? $100k? Even if a student understands what is being borrowed here, they may shrug it off and assume that it’ll be taken care of by expected future income.</p>
<p>In other words, there are social pressures in conflict with an overestimation of college benefit and an underestimation of college cost. It’s very much similar to the credit crisis. Except in this case, you can’t declare bankruptcy on college loans.</p>
<p>And, also much like the credit crisis, there’s more than enough blame to go around the table. It’s a systemic problem that is both cultural and financial in nature, consisting of many participants who all try to act in their own self-interests but may not be fully aware of the long-term consequences.</p>
<p>EDIT: I also want to point out that just because someone is college-educated/an engineer/someone with a powerful job/someone well-off/etc doesn’t mean they necessarily understand personal finance. Much of personal finance revolves around decision theory and understanding and parsing the underlying statistics/risks, which people are notoriously poor at understanding.</p>