<p>Which is better? </p>
<p>Am I better off just sending my ACT and not the SAT to the colleges I'm applying to? </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>bump</p>
<p><10char></p>
<p>The 28 is better, according to:</p>
<p>[Estimated</a> Relationship between ACT Composite Score and SAT CR+M+W Score](<a href=“http://www.act.org/aap/concordance/estimate.html]Estimated”>http://www.act.org/aap/concordance/estimate.html)</p>
<p>Im guessing the 28 is better. 28 over 36 is 78%. 1730 over 2400 is 72%.</p>
<p>Someone may want to confirm this, but I think that a 28 ACT is roughly equivalent to a 1950 SAT score.</p>
<p>28 corresponds to 1880. Didn’t you guys click on the link? :)</p>
<p>oh, nope 
Thanks for correcting me.</p>
<p>Thanks guys!</p>
<p>So I should just ditch the SAT scores altogether? I’m planning on retaking both, but after taking a couple of pratice tests of each, I’ve gotten the following</p>
<p>Sat- 1790
ACT- 29</p>
<p>Sat- 1810
ACT-30</p>
<p>So I guess I’ll stick with the ACT.</p>