<p>Hello from italy! </p>
<p>Yesterday, I was searching for info about admission requests for master degrees and I discovered that UCLA had a "strange" requiement for european Bachelor holders from Bologna process; it's said that "Applicants who studied under the Bologna Process should present the master's degree (3 + 2)." (<a href="https://grad.ucla.edu/gasaa/admissions/acadrecs.htm">https://grad.ucla.edu/gasaa/admissions/acadrecs.htm</a>). That means that for applying to an US master degree, I should already have one? Looks absurd... why should I apply to a master degree, if I already have one? :-? </p>
<p>I actually have a Bachelor of Management Engineering from University of Applied Science of Southern Switzerland and I was planning to attend a Master in US, but the fact that my Bachelor is on a 3 years basis - like all european bachelors- looks to put a question mark on everything. Is that true? I searched for aswers on google, but the situation looks unclear; what do you think?</p>
<p>I think that comparing the bachelors on the number of years - 3 vs 4 - would be a mistake, because they come from different systems of education. In Italy - and similarly in Europe - the high school (Liceo) lasts one year more than US secondary education and provides a 360° knowledge; for example, I studied at a Scientific Liceo and, despite the fact that the focus was on scientific subjects, I had to study also 5 years of Latin (!), 5 years of Italian Literature, 5 years of English Literature, 5 years of History, 5 years of Art History and 3 years of Philosophy. On the other hand, the bachelor is focused on Engineering subjects only.
American bachelors last longer, but they also look more "broader" and less focused; consequently, I believe that a 3 years european bachelor should be considered at least equal to a 4-years one from US. What do you think?</p>
<p>See you!
TAM :-h </p>