<p>For schools that state they only look at best single sitting:</p>
<p>SAT Score: 1350 (760M and 590CR/1400 and 1980/2400
ACT Composite: 30 (30M, 32R, 29E, 30S)</p>
<p>Which is better? (Concordance table says SAT is I think.) Will schools even look at both if you send both, or is it possibly they may accidentally enter the numbers that aren't as good?</p>
<p>your ACTs are more evenly balanced so that may make it viewed more favorably, and depending on the school. If you wish to focus on math then take the sat</p>
<p>30 is slighly above a 2000 so it’s better. A 1980 is about a 29-30–they’re really close.</p>
<p>Use percentiles over the concordance table. The concordance table uses a linear scale for all the scores, which is obviously wrong. It claims a 98% accuracy, so there’s a good ± 30-40 points.</p>
<p>cjgone…where are you seeing that a 30 is slightly above 2000? According to the table I have, a 30 is a 1950 to 1980.</p>
<p>^According to almost every other table.</p>
<p>Just calculate it by hand if you feel unsure using percentiles.</p>
<p>I’d say 1990-2020 or so.</p>
<p>The concordance table has some error in the top 30s because it uses a linear scale.</p>
<p>2nd link doesn’t give ranges.
1st is probably the most accurate using percentiles.</p>
<p>Anyway there’s other tables:
[Should</a> you take the SAT or the ACT? Compare the SAT vs ACT](<a href=“http://www.prepme.com/sat/satVsAct]Should”>http://www.prepme.com/sat/satVsAct)
[SAT-ACT</a> Conversion chart](<a href=“http://www.spartanburg6.k12.sc.us/dhs/Guidance%20website/SAT-ACT%20Conversion%20chart.html]SAT-ACT”>http://www.spartanburg6.k12.sc.us/dhs/Guidance%20website/SAT-ACT%20Conversion%20chart.html)
<a href=“http://www.act.org/aap/concordance/estimate.html[/url]”>http://www.act.org/aap/concordance/estimate.html</a></p>