<p>
[quote]
I said they look at yearly gpa, not that overall GPA doesn't matter. It's a fact that LSAC lists yearly gpas.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Yes, and the yearly GPA is not nearly as significant as the cum. GPA. Not even close. Go ahead and prove me wrong.</p>
<p>
[quote]
your crude personal attacks are not useful here.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Neither are yours.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Im pretty sure that if this person got a 177-180 on their LSAT the GPA discrepancy would be much less relevant.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>1) That is a pretty controversial assumption.
2) A 180 is not enough to compensate for a 3.5.</p>
<p>
[quote]
You are making an assumption on the first 2 years of school and your'e not paying any mind to the LSAT, EC's, or possible work experience
[/quote]
</p>
<p>No law school in the top 14, except for Yale, Stanford, and Northwestern, cares for ECs or work experience.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Nonetheless, for the sake of argument my whole point is you have no right to say that someone has no chance at Harvard when in essence you only know one quarter of the whole story.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>You are making a strawman out of my argument. I said that it is frivolous to discuss this right now. Get the numbers and then talk. Right now, he does not have a shot.</p>