<p>so i took my first practice test today. I took it in the princeton review book. I received a 670.. how accurate do you think that is? Is it easier than the real thing? Is it harder?</p>
<p>Harder. I got 680, 780, and 710 on the PR tests. I got an 800 on the real thing.</p>
<p>The only accurate Chem test is the one in the blue book. Do it :)</p>
<p>awesome! cuz like, dude i didnt even try on the practice test. It was just to see where id be without studying. Like a benchmark sorta. That made my day!</p>
<p>Oh that is REALLY good. I took my first PR test last weekend and got a 620. I'm shooting for 700+ in June...does that seem like too much of a jump?</p>
<p>Not at all :) good luck!</p>
<p>OMG that's awesome! Cause I always thought PR was suppose to be easier. I just took my first one ever and Got a 790</p>
<p>^ wow nice. i ll probably take another PR test next weekend.</p>
<p>uh... I think some of you may be a bit mislead. Not to burst any bubbles though, but I just asked my friend and he said he actually did a bit worse on the real thing than on the PR practice. So I really don't know what I should do. I'm really tempted to buy another book</p>
<p>The PR book is great. I got a 760 on the Pr tests, and an 800 on the real thing</p>
<p>ya.. from my first practice test, im taking all the facts i didnt know and putting them on flashcards, when i m done, i ll take another test and see how well i do.</p>
<p>Is a 560 on Chem even worth anything? Thats what I got.</p>
<p>depends where you are gonna be applying.</p>
<p>what about PR for Math IIC?
is it harder than the real thing?</p>
<p>^^I heard it's about the same.</p>