<p>I just took a Math II practice test on SparkNotes and scored a 780. I took two practice tests from the Barron's book and scored around a 590. Does this make sense? Am I prepared or is SparkNotes too easy???</p>
<p>no...barrons is wayyyy too hard. I scored 720 and 800 on sparknotes and could barely score a low 600 on barrons</p>
<p>What was your actual score?</p>
<p>I, and it seems many other people, have had results similar to yours; for me it was 570 on Barrons and 790 on College Board practice test. I'm sure you'll do fine on the real thing.</p>
<p>^ If you mean the real test, I haven't taken it yet, I'm going to take it tomorrow</p>
<p>elven_hobbit: have you taken the real test? if so what did you get?</p>
<p>if i've been scoring mid 700's on barrons should i be a-ok then?</p>
<p>Got a 750 on another SparkNotes test. It looks like we all should be in ok shape for tomorrow.</p>
<p>I got 780-800 in Kaplan, 730-750 in this "15 Realistic Tests" book, and low 700-730 for Barron's... weird</p>
<p>Does studying for Math II prep for Math I as well or are there topics on Math 1 that aren't on Math II?</p>
<p>math 1 has trick questions. Like they will ask you how many posts are in a 100m fence that has a post every 5 meters. Hint: it's not 20. Math 2 doesnt trick you like that, you just have to know your stuff</p>
<p>21? 10char</p>
<p>21? 10char char</p>
<p>I haven't taken the real test, just practice ones put out by the College Board in their prep books. However, having stuck around these boards for over a year, it seems that many people have found that a Barrons score is significantly lower than an actual score, and that PR/Sparknotes/College Board practice tests more accurately reflect what one might get on the real test.</p>
<p>ETA: Oh, and I'm taking it tomorrow.</p>