<p><satire>
Here are my SAT II Scores:
Literature 800
Math I 800
Math II 800
Physics 800
Chemistry 800
Biology E/M 800</satire></p>
<p>I am considering to apply to Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, and MIT.
Should I retake my SAT IIs for a 900 or should I take more SATIIs?
</p>
<p>you're an ***hole.</p>
<p>it's not funny.</p>
<p>I say take more.
But you're already pretty much screwed.
I say apply to your local community college as a reach and maybe, if you're lucky, you can transfer out to a different school. Definitely don't consider any privates though.</p>
<p>The lack of originality in Shadow's post is pathetic. How many threads are there like this, 9950950959595?</p>
<p>Yep and I respond to all of them the same exact way. </p>
<p>It just never gets old for me.</p>
<p>dude i would rethink it -- i hear colleges like 790's better</p>
<p>aa6590 is right... you really need to watch out for Tufts syndrome, especially if you have a 2400 on your SAT Is. In fact, I recommend taking them again and getting some scores in the low 600s, just in case. Tufts syndrome can be shocking to such qualified applicants as yourself--so be careful.</p>
<p>You should retake it to prove to admission officers that those 800s are not flukes</p>
<p>^^^thats actually a valid point :P^^^</p>
<p>your post is so lame and stolen that next time you post something it should go through a pop up blocker</p>
<p>I hope you guys saw the <satire> </satire> tags. Obviously, those are not my real scores. I am just trying to reiterate my point that standardized test scores are only one part of an application, because there are droves of people on this thread asking if they should retake a 750+. Please forgive me if this explanation does not suffice. :)</p>
<p>no hope. you failed at life. so sorry.</p>
<p>I couldn't agree with you more Shadowrider</p>
<p>I see so many people saying they won't be able to get into the ivy league because they got a 2200 on their SAT, or a 690 on their SATII</p>
<p>Standardized test scores are important, but there are so many things that matter even more.</p>
<p>^^ Everyone knows that---they're just saying that people have done this satire so many times that now it's old.
No one's mad because they think you're actually for real. </p>
<p>Actually, I'm not sure about nyyben.</p>
<p>The OP fails at being funny.</p>
<p>the post is hackneyed.....but still funny.</p>
<p>I was not trying to be funny. :)
I do not think that Mark Twain's satire was funny, but it did get the point across.
Satire - "trenchant wit, irony, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly"
Again, I apologize to everyone. :)
Keep up the great work!</p>