<p>“As for the career prospects, where you go as an undergrad isn’t going to matter a great deal from a name perspective to any particular law school - but the quality of the education is going to make a huge difference to your intellectual development long term. Don’t short-change yourself educationally by going some place easier, where you aren’t challenged to produce your best work.”</p>
<p>I really, really hope that my education will take me somewhere because it’s getting increasingly harder to justify my decision to go to Grinnell with my friends and family who just don’t buy the liberal arts education argument. </p>
<p>“If you feel intimidated by Grinnell students and think the work load is too tough, why do you think you can not only get into but succeed at a “top law school?” The LSAT doesn’t measure aptitude, but it does measure something. The median LSAT of Grinnell students is 161, according to the link I posted above. The median LSAT at Duke Law is 169. So, if you are intimidated by Grinnell kids, why aren’t you worried about being intimidated by the students at a top law school? Do you think the workload will be easier in law school? If so, let me assure you that it won’t be.”</p>
<p>“If you think that you can go to a different college, keep the same work habits, get a better gpa and catapult into a better law school-- I think–well, again this may be rude, but it’s true–that you are engaging in wishful thinking. There’s a reason why each law school you apply to gets not only your gpa, the median gpa of the LS applicants from that school, and the distribution of grades, but also the median LSAT of your college. And, believe me–I know some folks on this forum don’t–a 3.2 at a college where the median LSAT is 161 and the median gpa is 3.3ish isn’t going to be in worse shape than someone with a 3.4 at a school where the median LSAT is 149 and the median gpa is 3.2… I know, I KNOW lots of people think that Yale, Harvard and Stanford Law are filled with folks who got 4.0s at community college followed by 2 years at Widget Directional State. But, while there are certainly people who get into these schools from CC followed by 2 years somewhere else, most of those folks do amazingly well at the 2 years somewhere else and have high LSAT scores. And they are FAR outnumbered by the # of people who went to top 20 LACs. If you’re going to play the percentages, the LAC plan gives you much better odds.”</p>
<p>Okay, that last sentence made me feel better, thank you. </p>
<p>I’m not under the impression that law school will be easier. And while I’m not denying that the LSAT will probably standardize scores, I’m not personally confident about my intelligence enough to really well LSAT. What I’m saying that is that I actually think I could be a pretty good student at Directional State, which almost certainly has an easier workload. Unless Grinnell’s superior intellectual experience actually helps me on the LSAT… I think I would’ve been better off as say (assuming my LSAT score is independent of the college I go to)…3.9 at Directional State than say, 3.3 at Grinnell. Because everybody has given me the impression that law schools see GPA as absolute anyways. But is that what you’re trying to tell me - that Grinnell’s tough standards will help me do better on the LSAT? </p>
<p>But let’s say I was a better student and that I had average grades and LSAT for Grinnell. Are you saying that being average at Grinnell is just as good as being very good at Directional State for law school applications? Because if that holds true, that would definitely boost my confidence. How about even being below average at Grinnell? </p>
<p>See, I was under the impression that being above average ANYWHERE is what law schools prefer. And my rationale would then be that it is far, far easier in an absolute sense to be above average at Directional State than it is to be above average at Grinnell. </p>
<p>“Now I happen to think that some LACs do a less than stellar job with career guidance. But I poked around a while on Grinnell’s website as well as that of Illinois Wesleyan and Lake Forest College. Now, perhaps the websites are misleading, but I came away with the impression that Grinnell is WAY ahead of the other two schools in terms of law school guidance AND career guidance. I’m not knocking the other schools, but I LIKE LACs that put the link to career guidance right there on the home page. I like LACs that offer LSAT and MCAT classes right on campus with a special discount rate negotiated by the college, that have an internship data bank, a resume review service, internship programs offered for credit, and several other things I noted on the website. And I also like LACs that say right upfront how they do in terms of placing students into med and law schools…and hand out info like the median gpa and LSAT scores of LS applicants.”</p>
<p>““Who are these people who are telling you that everyone at Grinnell gets worse grades in their soph,jr, and sr years than their freshman year and that Lake Forest College or Illinois Wesleyan will give you better career prospects than Grinnell? Because while I don’t have access to grades at Grinnell and I’m not a human resource department manager, I have a really, really hard time believing that either of these statements is true.””</p>
<p>Well, thank you for putting that much effort into knowing about my issue! I certainly appreciate it. I’ll admit that I wasn’t aware that we had that many career services. Maybe I assumed too much based on the goals of students I talked to Grinnell. Few people are career driven. Most people don’t even know what they want to do yet, which I viewed as a good thing because I’m a little bit of the same way. </p>
<p>But by the same token, most people don’t even seem to care about earning a living. I get the impression that most people want to live off of their parents for a while and go to grad school (by grad school, I mean academic and nonprofessional)…which is not at all what I really I want to do. I guess I feel so uneasy because many people on capus actually make fun of themselves by saying something to the effect “After I get out of where, I’d be lucky to get a job. I think I should stay in school longer” …which makes me sometime wonder “Why did I go here? I wanted to be able to get a job after college. I thought that was one of the points of going to college.” If I’m not going to any better off than the kids graduating from Illinois Wesleyan and Lake Forest (where some classes have a more professional focus), then I wouldn’t care at all. </p>
<p>I get the impression that my grades will not improve because many students tell me that intro classes are easier…to the point where people take certain intro classes and call them “GPA boosters.” I don’t plan on taking many more introductory classes, so I would have lost that cushion. Again, I’m not trying to excuse myself for being lazy but I don’t want to come out of college with an embarrassing GPA that I will constantly have to explain. </p>
<p>But yeah, I’d like to thank all of you guys for giving me feedback. I’m sorry if I act like I know how the world works or I’m basing life on false impressions… but I know that I don’t know how anything works. I’m just a clueless kid who needs advice on what to do.</p>