<p>DK, I understand your point of view regarding DH. </p>
<p>Although I did not discuss it in my prior post, your quotation of my earlier statement was a tad out of its original context. As stated in my prior post, I formed my opinion SEVERAL years ago, and well before the Direct Hits became available. I believe that it is still pretty clear today that a listing that includes “TestMasters: 2 Hits; Princeton Review: 2 Hits; Hot Words: 3 Hits; Rocket Review: 2 Hits; and finally Barron’s: 9 Hits” is hardly a positive testimonial for spending time on such lists, especially when analyzing the EXACT words that provided a “hit.” </p>
<p>All in all, as your analysis seems to indicate, it is entirely possible that reading Direct Hits offers a much better return on one’s time and investment than it was possible a few years ago. After all, there is a world of difference between reading words in context and simply trying to memorize 3500 words. </p>
<p>For good measure, I paste the original exchange. HTH! </p>