<p>Part of the passage: (Talking about the intelligence of human and chimps)</p>
<hr>
<h2>One commentator has said that the big difference between humans and chimps is that humans can invent great wonders of technology. "I considered the differences between men and animals," this person wrote, "Some were vast. A chimpanzee could be taught to drive a car. It could even be taught to build parts of it. But it could not begin to design it.... Our intellect is incomparably more sophiscated than [that of] any animal." One hears this sort of argument often, and, to my mind, it is mere self-stroking puffery.</h2>
<p>In the last sentence ("It...puffery"), the author characterizes the commentator's argument as:
(A) useless flattery
(B) exaggerated self-regard
(C) witty repartee
(D) self-conscious hyperbole
(E) deliberate distortion</p>
<hr>
<p>The choice (B) and (D) I suppose have similar kinda meaning...
So how to choose...
Any ideas? Thanks!</p>