That’s quite a broad generalization, IMHO. And it was not consideration of cost I found distasteful, but rather the comment that “people that don’t worry about money have way too much money”.
Do they spend broadly on it or do third parties pay? Seems to be contradictory. I am sure you understand that I was referring to out of pocket choices and not “someone else’s money”, as that would have made no sense as an example. You can ignore that one and go right to the pet example if that is less nuanced.
It was the comment “Ppl who don’t worry about money either have way too much money, or someone else pays their bills!” . There are just as many who are willing to pay what it costs without consideration of that; meaning that they value the experience more than the capital. Surely you can understand that without needed to accuse them of having “way too much money”? Do you see how that comment could be viewed as distasteful?