<p>^^ By hawkette’s logic, you should avoid the following schools:</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Harvard, MIT, and any other Boston-area school. The Boston metropolitan area is projected to grow by a modest 259,000 persons between 2010 and 2025, falling out of the top 10 metro areas. Elsewhere around New England, look for flat to very modest population growth. Clearly a loser region.</p></li>
<li><p>Columbia, NYU, and any other NYC-area school. The New York City metro is projected to grow by a modest 668,000 people between 2010 and 2025. I know, it sounds like a lot, but this is really a modest growth rate for a metro area of some 19 million persons—a total increase of just 3.5% over a 15-year period, which works out to, what, about two-tenths of a percent per year growth? That’s stagnation! New York will remain number one only because it starts with such a formidable lead.</p></li>
<li><p>Penn, Swarthmore, and any other Philadelphia-area college. The Philadelphia metro is projected to add a mere 210,000 people over the next 15 years, almost falling out of the top 10.</p></li>
<li><p>WUSTL. Thew St. Louis metro is expected to grow by a paltry 109,000, falling out of the top 20 metro areas.</p></li>
<li><p>CMU. The Pittsburg population is projected to nosedive by 128,000, one of the largest absolute drops and one of the largest percentage drops (-5.5%) for any top-30 metro area. (In contrast, Detroit’s much-ballyhooed population decline is, according to these estimates, expected to amount to all of 7,000 persons, or a little over 1/10th of 1% of its much-larger population). By 2025, Pittsburgh will no longer be in the top 30.</p></li>
<li><p>Case Western. Cleveland is right there with Pittsburg, losing 146,000 or a full 7% of its population—again, far worse in both absolute and percentage terms than Detroit. Cleveland also drops out of the top 30.</p></li>
<li><p>Brown. Metro Providence is projected to grow by a trivial 62,000.</p></li>
<li><p>Tulane. Metro New Orleans is projected to be down by 66,000, or nearly 6% of its current population. already decimated by post-Katrina losses. On a percentage basis, roughly as bad as Cleveland and Pittsburgh. New Orelans drops out of the top 50 metro areas.</p></li>
<li><p>Cornell, RPI, U Rochester, Colgate, Hamilton, anyplace in upstate New York. It’s a bloodbath up there. As best I can tell, every metro area in upstate New York (with the exception of Albany which shows a modest, almost trivial population increase) is projected to lose population between 2010 and 2025, in absolute numbers and on a percentage basis far worse than Detroit, the so-called “poster child” for population decline.</p></li>
<li><p>Yale. Metro New Haven population essentially flat, New Haven falls from #59 to #70 among metro areas.</p></li>
<li><p>Bowdoin, Bates, Colby. Maine’s population growth is projected to be flat, flat, flat.</p></li>
<li><p>Princeton. I guess Princeton is in metro Trenton, which is flat, flat, flat. In any event, it’s located squarely between New York City and Philadelphia which we’ve already identified as loser places.</p></li>
<li><p>Notre Dame. Metro South Bend down 4,000. Heck, that’s almost as much in absolute numbers as Detroit, off a population base less than 1/10 as large.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Hawkette’s right, of course. Instead of the above-mentioned loser schools, you’ll want to cast your lot with the likes of:
- Arizona State. (Phoenix metro projected population +3 million).
- UNLV. (Las Vegas +1.7 million)
- University of Central Florida (Orlando + 1.4 million)
- UNC-Charlotte (Charlotte + 1.1 million)
- UC Riverside (Riverside-San Bernardino +2.2 million)
- SMU (Dallas +2.9 million)
- University of South Florida (Tampa-St. Pete + 1.2 million)</p>
<p>Some other highlights:
- Chicago (+8.97%) is expected to grow at a much fast clip than New York.
- Minneapolis-St.Paul (+23.99%) is expected to grow at roughly the same pace as Silicon Valley (San Jose +24.99%)
- Medium-to-large metro areas in the Upper Midwest are expected to grow at a brisk clip, led by Sioux Falls (+45.73%), Des Moines (+32.25%), Rochester MN (+28.07%), Indianapolis (+27.93%), Fargo (+27.46%), Madison (+25.05%), and anchoring them all, Minneapolis-St. Paul (23.99%). Frostbelt, here we come!
- Despite Detroit’s essentially unchanged population, much of Michigan is expected to grow at a reasonably healthy rate, led by Ann Arbor (+13.85%, with the metro Ann Arbor population expected to hover around 400,000 by 2025), Grand Rapids (+13.36%, approaching 1 million by 2025), Kalamazoo (+13.99%) , Muskegon (+7.86%), and Lansing (+6.0%). All these growth rates exceed those of most medium-to-large metro areas in the Northeast.</p>
<p>This is all silliness of course. But I think you get the point.</p>