<p>JHS,</p>
<p>Most of your post is a bunch of examples that would serve to counter my argument, if I was arguing tha being a legacy guaranteed admission. Since I'm not arguing that, I fail to see the point. The rest of it is a bunch of assertions, most of which I believe are generally false. It is a waste of every one's time for me to simply assert the opposite. Mixed in with these are a bunch of truisms that don't matter like the statement that some of the recruited athletes, URMS and legacies are in the top 1-2%. Yes, I'm sure some are.</p>