<p>Your enthusiasm and the extent of your involvement in your ECs will generally be reflected throughout your application (LORs, essays, awards, etc). </p>
<p>For the ECs that matter, adcoms can verify them easily. Lying that you were a member of XYZ club for four years will not boost your application–it’s the impact you’ve had on your ECs (e.g. awards won, money fundraised, research published) that will make a difference to adcoms, and those things are readily verifiable.</p>
<p>Some schools also check up on the truthfulness of an application. For instance, UCs randomly select 10% of all applications to verify. </p>
<p>Again, you can probably get away with saying that you were a four-year member of some obscure club…but that wouldn’t improve your application. If anything, it’d appear like you’re a serial joiner with no real interest or initiative in activities. Tempted to lie about leadership positions, awards, and impact? Think again. Those things are all quick and easy for adcoms to verify.</p>
<p>Several adcoms have confirmed that they check the “hours per week, weeks per year” values of applications. Most adcoms have had years of experience evaluating applications, so anything out of the ordinary or curiously not in sync with the rest of an application will spark their attention.</p>
<p>And don’t even get me started with the ethical violations of lying on your application…but not like you have any ethics to begin with :)</p>
<p>I want to reiterate that the ECs that can be lied about are insignificant to your application, and the ECs that matter can be readily checked. Still persistent on lying your way into college? The consequences of getting caught far outweigh the marginal (if any existing) benefits of lying about your ECs. </p>
<p>I sincerely feel sorry for you, that you are so doubtful and unconfident of your qualifications that you’ll even make them up. You poor, poor thing.</p>