<p>“Instead of explaining what happened after that, the Dean hides behind privacy while at the same time not hesitating to smear her reputation without relating any facts.”</p>
<p>Where was the smearing exactly? He said there were “inaccuracies” and “misrepresentations” but that hardly counts as a smear. </p>
<p>And it is not “hid[ing] behind privacy”. He is not permitted to talk about someone’s private medical file. You expect him to say “she has had numerous psychotic episodes and in September was discovered to be eating pieces wallboard and claimed it was bread wafers given to her be Maria Theresa of Austria”. He cant do that. </p>
<p>She can make her claims and all he can do is say “thats not accurate”. </p>
<p>Like he noted I dont find it likely that there is some vast conspiracy of psychiatric professionals against her.</p>