<p>This thread actually relates a lot to the topics discussed in <a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-admissions/559068-gpa-ranking-system-fallacies.html%5B/url%5D">http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-admissions/559068-gpa-ranking-system-fallacies.html</a>, but I want to hear from people who have experience with accelerated med programs and know about their standards in particular. </p>
<p>I have a friend who is very worried about his chances in applying to accelerated med programs (NU's HPME, Brown's PLME, Drexel's, GWU's, PSU's, BU's...) because most ask for class rank, and his is "only" 8 out of 333. He has an unweighted 4.0, but because he took Latin for three years (unweighted even though he took it up to the fourth year level) and the electives Art and Software Apps (an art credit and a tech credit are required for graduation anyways), his weighted GPA is lower than those of people who stocked up on weighted courses every year. </p>
<p>In the thread that I mentioned above, someone posted that about half of colleges recalculate GPAs anyways, and he knows this (he is also aware of the fact that colleges look at your UW GPA and course rigor as opposed to the W GPA), but he's not worried about the GPA itself, which is a respectable 4.69. He's worried that since he's ranked 8, schools will think that he slacked and didn't take a rigorous courseload compared to what is available at our school. Clearly, he did; Latin is just as "rigorous" as many of the weighted classes. Also, in case it matters, the number one student has a W GPA of 4.83; obviously, the differences are fractional. </p>
<p>Do you guys think that his schools (med programs in particular) will overlook his "low" rank, or could it possibly hurt him?</p>