<p>I need some adjectives to attach to my scores. I don't know anyone else who has taken SAT II's.</p>
<p>660 USH
660 LIT</p>
<p>I gather from other postings that most people on this site would be pretty disappointed with these scores, but just HOW bad are they?</p>
<p>Please...someone. I am SO insecure right now.</p>
<p>Depends on where you want to apply... Bad for Ivy Leagues.. Decent for the rest..</p>
<p>Basically, they are good scores. Bear in mind that regular posters at CC are a pretty self-selective and obesessive pool, so don't be dissapointed just because they would be...</p>
<p>gahh i'm obsessive too but i guess i should stop thinking i am one of these "self-selected" few. for once, if i could score anywhere "above average" i would be ecstatic..this is so frustrating. time to give up.</p>
<p>How would those scores look if someone had those scores and was applying to Boston College with a 3.4 out of 4.0 GPA? I second Jai83303. If you want to apply to the ivies then retake them.</p>
<p>what is that supposed to mean? those scores tend to coincide with a poor GPA? that's not true in my case and that's one of the reasons why this is so frustrating...i guess some people just don't test well but why oh WHY do i have to be one of them?!!!</p>
<p>I'm retaking a 660 USH.</p>
<p>is bc on a par with middlebury, princeton or mit?</p>
<p>the range on those schools' SATIIs is roughly 700-750.</p>
<p>660 should be a fine score for bc. it's not anything to get depressed about.</p>
<p>But I don't WANT to go to BC! Ahh, CollegeBoard, why do you hate me?</p>
<p>they are above average, but you need higher scores for ivies</p>
<p>hope that helped</p>
<p>Boston college is definitely below Princeton and MIT etc. It's not even a top 20 school maybe top 50 but it's still very competitive to get into.</p>
<p>to base an opinion on BC utilizing the USNWR rankings is a joke.</p>
<p>it is clearly a very selective school but it isn't a Princeton, MIT, or Middlebury.</p>
<p>Scattergrams tell a much more accurate picture.</p>
<p>The USNWR is way too subjective.</p>
<p>what is scattergrams?</p>
<p>cin,</p>
<p>Last year's mean was 601 History; 583 Lit., so your scores are anything but average. Even more important, SATIIs are required mainly by highly selective schools, so the pool of people taking them skews <em>much</em> higher than for the SAT-Reasoning. Your scores would be at about the 75-80 percentile for Literature and only a little lower for history. In other words: in a cohort made up overwhelmingly of high-achievers applying to the country's most selective colleges, you're in the top quarter to third. If you're disappointed, there are about 80,000 students who'd like to switch scores with you :-)</p>
<p>softball/baseball:</p>
<p>scattergrams are available from many high schools usually for a range of years and providing a gpa and standardized test level which indicates admission/rejection/waitlist. it doesnt provide other background such as athleticism, legacy, special talent.
usually it's on tcci.naviance.com/(schoolname her)---if you google you can get a password for some, others don't require it.</p>