<p>Hi everyone, I am trying to transfer from Loyola University to mainly either BC, Cornell, or Brown (also Harvard, but that is so much of a reach that I am not worrying about it). I just got my ACT scores back (first time taking it) and got a 31. Do you guys think I should try to retake the SAT (or should i go for the SAT II's?). My old SAT score is a 1920, which won't be sent in. My SAT II's are a 770 US, 650 Math I, 640 lit. On the first three tests in the blue book (the real tests), i got a 2070, 2060 and 2140. In other words, it is around my ACT score when converted to the SAT scale. Do you guys think the ACT scores are reasonable for those schools, or should i try my luck on the SAT's? If you think I should take the SAT 1's, do you think an improvement from a 650 to 700 math is reasonable given that the test is in 2 weeks?<br>
Thanks everyone (if i took the SAT II's, it would probably be lit again, as well as world history).</p>
<p>Thanks, tbh I am not really worrying about Harvard since my chance is so slim, I am more concerned about whether a 31 is good for cornell/brown/bc.</p>
<p>31 = 2100 SAT, which is pretty mediocre for Ivy Leagues, especially since transfers have it even harder than regular admissions.</p>
<p>Hmm, you sure? Collegeboard/common app so the average is a 31… Regardless, you think I should take the SAT then, despite the fact that my scores are about the same? (maybe i’ll get lucky i suppose)</p>