<p>Can you guys tell me whether the following books contain tests that will give me a good indication of where i stand as far as my capabilities on the real ACT?</p>
<p>McGraw Hill 2010 ACT </p>
<p>Princeton Review 2009 ACT</p>
<p>Princeton Review 2008 ACT</p>
<p>Any feedback on past experiences or what you've heard would be awesome....detail on the lesson portion of the books would be great but i really want to know specifically about the effectiveness of the tests in these books. Thanks a lot!</p>
<p>Just use PR 2009. 10 char</p>
<p>If you want/need more practice use PR 1296.</p>
<p>Ok, let me be the first to say that an old PR book isn’t worth a centennial.</p>
<p>New PR (2009), would be reasonably diagnostic.</p>
<p>McGraw Hill = Crap</p>
<p>It just doesn’t have realistic practice tests (too easy)</p>
<p>“The Real ACT Prep Guide.” The ACT makes it and it contains 3 released ACT tests. Can’t say there’s any better measure of “capabilities on the real ACT” than that.</p>
<p>^ Outside of the books the OP mentioned, the real ACT prep guide is indeed the most diagnostic. PR has a much better review section, though.</p>