<p>Amherst College and Oberlin come to mind. My eldest 2 went to those places.</p>
<p>I believe in small or medium-sized LAC's for introverted and very brilliant students, because they will find like-minded friends and discover community. They will not ghettoize, either, since there are few enough people that they must learn to interact with others. For example, my D was interested in writing (and was quite immature emotionally, socially); a tangential thinker, very creative and spontaneous. By sophomore year, her boyfriend was in Computer Science; a focused and logical thinker, very organized and in need of someone to take him away from the screen and smell the roses. They met each other through a Gaming EC. If they'd only socialized with others of same majors, perhaps their paths would have never crossed, but at a small LAC this happened very readily. Both of their lives improved for having met each other. Their circle of friends encompassed every other major: social science, the arts, physical science, math, music...and their educations were a case of "the sum is greater than the parts." </p>
<p>I think universities are great for people who use resources well, and since "resources" are also people, if he has some way to go in learning to connect with people, he's less likely to push his weight around enough at a university early on. So I'm sorry but I would not send a person with this profile to Cornell. Why?? It's a huge university that rewards academics but does not require a person to leave his academic comfort zone. Unless you want the student to have the exact same skill set as when he entered college, I am rah-rah for him to pick the highest caliber LAC's in the country and leave the Unis for graduate school.</p>
<p>Amherst doesn't do any interviews, so you could avoid that issue there.</p>
<p>Oberlin has a reputation for "think outside the box", "quirky" whatever you wish to call it, but my D said that her friends "embraced their inner nerd" and were all wonderful people, brilliant, funny, patient with each other. They absolutely do not care what you wear. Compared to Swarthmore, it's probably of equal strength academically but reputedly Oberlin is less of a pressure cooker than Swarthmore. </p>
<p>Check out the Math departments in each place to be sure they'd satisfy, but I think either of those schools would be very accepting of him AS HE IS RIGHT NOW, and he will inevitably develop there so he'll be a different man in 4 years.</p>
<p>Do not worry. Every kid has an arc or a journey. Yours is very high achieving and without your saying so, I'm imagining he's also rather kind, ethical and responsible. Try reading some of the other threads where kids are social hounds but mucking up academically or disrespecting their families and count your blessings. They, too, have an "arc" that has to occur but wouldn't you rather have your kid than theirs? ;) </p>
<p>I am sure others will protest my strong emphasis on LAC's, and I've never actually sent my kids to a large university (youngest is now in a medium sized one, but he had social skills early on, and is thriving there). So I don't really know what happens to the brilliant introvert at a larger uni...but I do know these LAC's (Amherst, Oberlin) were GREAT for my two kids.</p>