<p>Why the obsession with AA as opposed to other preferences? At most of you prestig colleges AA hasn't resulted in more than a handful of black students - - usually 2-4% of student body (slightly highter at the Ivies and some top southern schools).</p>
<p>The number/percentage of students entering through other preferences - - legacies, athletes, geo pref - - is greater than the number/percentage of black students entering through AA. </p>
<p>For example, a friend's S (White) was recently admitted to a top tier school in Western Mass. S plays baseball (pitcher). Baseball coach was giddy when he saw S's stats and called the family stating, "He's strong enought to sqeak through admissions, so I can still pull 4 players from the reject pile!" Four is by no means a large number, but that was for just one D-III team. </p>
<p>Similarly, a teacher friend took a sabbatical in Nebraska, in part to improve her D's chances of admission to prestig colleges. D (White) applied from Nebraska h.s. with mediocre stats (1300, 3.1 a couple of APs) and was admitted to every Ivy to which she applied except Harvard. Very different result than if she'd applied from the tri-state area (spit and hit a kid who scored 1450+). D (White) of another friend (a legit VT resident) had a similar experience. </p>
<p>Why should my D be penalized b/c she's applying NY (a particularly strong candidate pool) instead of from Georgia, SC, NC, Mich or even OH (Much Minn, Ore, Wyo, Miss and AL)? I'm certain NY families would apply from their country homes - - if those homes weren't in rural/suburban CT.</p>
<p>I don't think I need to say anything about the legacies (by far the largest of all preference groups - - outside of D-I athletes, for whom college is really a f/t job).</p>
<p>So, if you're really concerned w/ fairness or just motivated by healthy self-interest, AA is the least of your worries.</p>