<p>My college is pretty quick to rush us into Physics because of the volume of courses engineering majors will have to take. They have us taking Physics 1 with Calc 1 as a co-req and Physics 2 with Calc 2 as a co-req. I heard you're doomed for failure if you do it this way, because you're not sufficiently prepared for the math you're going to encounter.</p>
<p>I have credit for Calc 1 and the Algebra-Based Physics sequence. I'm confident I know my Calc 1 stuff and I'm pretty good at Mechanics, but I know nothing about E&M, yet I still got a credit for it. (The AP Algebra-Based exam is poorly designed; it's is one big test; I guess I did well enough on the mechanics part to make up for my complete lack of knowledge of E&M.)</p>
<p>So, my question is, should I take Calc 2 with Physics 1 and Calc 3 with Physics 2? That way my knowledge from Alg-Based physics last year is fresh in my head. BUT I've also heard that the more math you know, the easier Physics becomes (E&M in particular, which would really help me out). So, should I do the Chem sequence this year instead and, next year, take Linear Algebra with Physics 1 and Differential Equations with Physics 2. Would that help me a lot in my Physics classes?</p>
<p>I heard another plus about waiting off a little bit until you develop good math skills is that you actually understand Physics, not just know how to do a problem, but why.</p>
<p>So, which would you recommend for me?</p>