<p>
</p>
<p>so what question is that?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>oh, that was an easy math question. it was like "how many months was the family’s energy bill less than ___? and then you just had to look at the graph.</p>
<p>^^Thanks andreaaaaaa, I forgot about that one :)</p>
<p>i don’t remember a stoic either. and i remember seeing consummate, but i remember it being incorrect. i have no idea what the question was again though. Family bill was like 3. I’m pretty sure it was charlatan. i remember in the very beginning of the passage, i knew he was discrediting those people. his wording was like… some people claim or something like that. key phrase… they claim</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I had it narrowed down to that “the audience’s susceptibility to persuasion” (exact wording I believe) and “the people’s apetite for history” (not so sure if that’s exact). I picked the latter; does anyone else agree? I could very well be wrong, but the “audience” didn’t make sense to me.</p>
<p>Also, does anyone recall the other options for the photo albums/wall question? </p>
<p>And the fourth correct answer for the Candy Factory was “indignant.”</p>
<p>We need more posts like Andrea’s. Good job.</p>
<p>wow andreaaaa… i think me and you will have the same reading score :)</p>
<p>I had the same problem as you, but i swithced it to audience’s susceptibility to persuasion. He says something how like audiences are easily persuaded, and i didnt see much supporting that they had a big apetite for history. What about the physics one? Plums represented…truths needing to be discovered or w/e? And the comparison between the 2 “communications”?</p>
<p>i think it was susceptible, because gaping makes them seem sort of stupid. like randy on my name is earl. randy will just do whatever you tell him, because he doesnt know any better. what i got from the passage was that if scholars didnt write history, the public would simply take it from wherever they could get it, because they could be persuaded so easily.</p>
<p>hopefully that makes sense.</p>
<p>leighnesh, why is that? how many do you think you missed.</p>
<p>Only 2 of our answers were different .. I felt that it was an easy 700 minimum. (what about you?)</p>
<p>oh, well those answers arent necessarily my answers, unfortunately. i compilied it from all the threads.</p>
<p>which of your answers were different?</p>
<p>and if you only missed two, you wil get way more than 700. maybe even 800, if its a good curve.</p>
<p>I put oracle (I confident with that answer).. and I didn’t put wi****l (though, I’m pretty sure that couldn’t have been the answer)</p>
<p>was it wi****l? I put that because none of the others made sense. he wasnt nostalgic, or angry, restrained etc. Im pretty confident it was charlatan. guess one of us will be dissapointed lol</p>
<p>yes, wist/<em>/</em>/ful. and i put charlatan. i think thats right. but we will see when the qas comes out, i guess.</p>
<p>Wi****l means pensively sad. No way was he pensively sad and or/longing. I just crossed out all the negative words or words that didn’t make sense because, from what I remember of the passage, it was far from negative and didn’t mention anything about longing for something.</p>
<p>it was resilience for teh dutch one?</p>
<p>wi*<strong><em>l- 1. characterized by melancholy; longing; yearning.
I was hesistant to put wi</em></strong>*l too, but if u look at the choices, nothing makes sense. the answer choices were like nostalgic, angry, restrained, and something else. Estatic i think? None of those made sense. he was yearning</p>
<p>Oh wait, I didn’t put resilience either ( I guess thats three)… what were the choices do you remember?</p>
<p>And also, can you refresh my memory about what passage “wi****l” was from? Thanks.</p>
<p>i dont remember enigma (might have been a experimental). i remember putting some hyroc (i dont know what word it was) and had no idea what it meant. For that woman who had like amazing techniques, i didnt put visionary, i put some word that ended in aire?</p>
<p>Doctrinaire? That isn’t right.. though not a horrible answer.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>the physics passage.</p>
<p>Hmm just looked it up. Dang, thats 2 wrong atleast now. What was it? I remember limiting it down to doctrinaire and visionary, but i didn’t feel she was visionary in any way. it didnt imply she had a vision… i dont think. What was the answer to the plum question with the physics passagE?</p>