Americans like college on sale

<p>In Twist on Tuition Game, Popularity Rises With Price</p>

<p>COLLEGEVILLE, Pa. — John Strassburger, the president of Ursinus College, a small liberal arts institution here in the eastern Pennsylvania countryside, vividly remembers the day that the chairman of the board of trustees told him the college was losing applicants because of its tuition. </p>

<p>It was too low.</p>

<p>So early in 2000 the board voted to raise tuition and fees 17.6 percent, to $23,460 (and to include a laptop for every incoming student to help soften the blow). Then it waited to see what would happen.</p>

<p>Ursinus received nearly 200 more applications than the year before. Within four years the size of the freshman class had risen 35 percent, to 454 students. Applicants had apparently concluded that if the college cost more, it must be better.</p>

<p>“It’s bizarre and it’s embarrassing, but it’s probably true,” Dr. Strassburger said. </p>

<p>Ursinus also did something more: it raised student aid by nearly 20 percent, to just under $12.9 million, meaning that a majority of its students paid less than half price.</p>

<p>Ursinus is not unique. With the race for rankings and choice students shaping college pricing, the University of Notre Dame, Bryn Mawr College, Rice University, the University of Richmond and Hendrix College, in Conway, Ark., are just a few that have sharply increased tuition to match colleges they consider their rivals, while also providing more financial assistance.</p>

<p>The recognition that families associate price with quality, and that a tuition rise, accompanied by discounts, can lure more applicants and revenue, has helped produce an economy in academe something like that in the health care system, with prices rising faster than inflation but with many consumers paying less than full price. </p>

<p>Average tuition at private, nonprofit four-year colleges — the price leaders — rose 81 percent from 1993 to 2004 , more than double the inflation rate, according to the College Board, while campus-based financial aid rose 135 percent. </p>

<p>The average cost of tuition, fees, room and board at those colleges is now $30,367. Many charge much more; at George Washington University, the sum is more than $49,000. </p>

<p>But aid is now so extensive that more than 73 percent of undergraduates attending private four-year institutions received it in the school year that ended in 2004, not even counting loans. </p>

<p>“We can cushion the sticker shock,” said Amy Gutmann, president of the University of Pennsylvania, which distributes aid on the basis of financial need. “We focus on both middle-income and low-income families.” </p>

<p>Still, none of this explains why colleges like Swarthmore and Ursinus — with different student-faculty ratios, endowments and reputations — end up with tuition and fees only a few hundred dollars apart, or less. Or why Harvard’s tuition and fees, at $33,709, are virtually the same as theirs.</p>

<p>One big reason is that institutions of higher learning watch one another. </p>

<p>In November, the finance committee of Swarthmore’s board of managers gathered at a Manhattan law firm and pored over a chart of tuition, room and board at more than 30 prestigious colleges and universities. They were pleased to see that Swarthmore was charging somewhat less than most of its competitors.</p>

<p>That kind of scrutiny led Bryn Mawr to a contrary sentiment, causing the college to raise tuition and fees this year by about 9 percent, their biggest jump in several years. Bryn Mawr officials say they made the decision after their research showed that the college charged less than its rivals and awarded more aid. The officials concluded that raising tuition would not deter applicants, because prospective students already assumed that Bryn Mawr cost the same as comparable colleges. </p>

<p>“The question was, Does that make sense?” said John Griffith, Bryn Mawr’s treasurer and chief financial officer. “Have we benefited at all from being the low price point? And the answer was no.”</p>

<p>Some of the nation’s bigger institutions have also found an incentive to raise prices. As part of an effort to improve its academic offerings and transcend its renown for football, the University of Notre Dame has raised tuition and fees by an inflation-adjusted 27 percent since 1999, to $32,900. In setting tuition, Notre Dame watches 20 other colleges and universities, including the University of Chicago, Emory and Vanderbilt.</p>

<p>“We’re setting it by our competitors,” said the Rev. John I. Jenkins, the institution’s president.</p>

<p>But Notre Dame’s financial aid has increased even more over the same period, with undergraduate scholarships up 107 percent after adjustment for inflation. This year the university is distributing $68 million.</p>

<p>Facing stiff competition, Hendrix College, a small liberal arts institution in Conway, Ark., decided two years ago to bolster its academic offerings, promising students at least three hands-on experiences outside the classroom, including research, internships and service projects. It also raised tuition and fees 29 percent, to $21,636. Most of the increase went back to students as aid.</p>

<p>As a result, 409 students enrolled in the freshman class this year, a 37 percent increase.</p>

<p>“What worked was the buzz,” said J. Timothy Cloyd, the Hendrix president. “Students saw that they were going to get an experience that had value, and the price positioning conveyed to them the value of the experience.”</p>

<p>said Ian David Campbell Newbould, the college’s president. “People don’t want cheap.”</p>

<p>But they do apparently want a deal, or at least the perception of one. Lucie Lapovsky, a consultant who was once president of Mercy College in New York, conducted a study asking students to choose between a college charging $20,000 and offering no aid, and one charging $30,000 and offering a $10,000 scholarship. Students chose the pricier option.</p>

<p>“Americans seem to like college on sale,” Dr. Lapovsky said. </p>

<p>full article at </p>

<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/12/education/12tuition.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5094&en=9fef9f6620b8c02e&hp&ex=1165986000&partner=homepage%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/12/education/12tuition.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5094&en=9fef9f6620b8c02e&hp&ex=1165986000&partner=homepage&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>This fits with the consumerist American ethic.
It's like colleges have become a luxury item that we want to find at Costco. High prices make it more attractive but we all want discounts.</p>

<p>I feel very lucky that S#1 picked big State U. This is not the case with DD who is applying right now. Bargain hunting doesn't seem like a great way to pick a school.</p>

<p>I just finished reading this and searched CC to see if someone had already started a thread on it and Simba did. </p>

<p>Sounds like colleges are joining the airlines and the gas stations in carefully coordinated pricing. </p>

<p>Well, I don't blame them; I know kids who chose their college because the merit aid offers made them feel 'wanted' and boosted their ego.</p>

<p>Interesting -- my oldest is still two years away from applying, but I hadn't even considered looking at tuition when advising him on colleges. We fall under the low-income, less than $1000 EFC group so my thoughts, after reading so many posts on CC, is to have him apply to a good selection of safety, match and reach that he would be happy to attend and then compare cost, since for us it will really come down to financial aid.</p>

<p>Thanks for posting the article. This is a good exploration of how colleges change perceptions about their brand name by changing list prices and "scholarship" policies.</p>