“Duke has never been accused of any of the things you allege in post #31.”
Well that doesn’t mean they haven’t done what CU posted, not sure on the rape culture for Duke, but without a doubt, revenue college sports is corrupt, the ncaa never had the teeth or frankly, the desire to take out a program like Duke or Kansas. The FBI doesn’t have those concerns. There are tapes where Kansas was trying to recruit Zion and Addidas rep said he needs money and his family needs housing. The KU asst coach is on tape saying, we’ll make that happen. And he signs at Duke and you don’t think he or his family got any of that, they signed for the purity of playing at Duke? Duke basketball is corrupt, there should be very little doubt on that.
“Duke, like all of its peers,will always have a basketball team (and recruiting).”
Well most of Duke’s peers including UNC do not use 1 and done’s like Duke does. UNC, while having its own share of issues (tutors doing work for players) only had two 1 and done’s in Roy Williams’ tenure, and Villanova (NC 2 of last three years) does not depend on 1 and done’s, again like Duke, Kansas and Kentucky do. Those are where most of the 1 and done’s go, and not surprisingly are the most corrupt programs.
There’s a difference between recruiting 1 and done players who you know will leave after one year and recruiting players who may end up leaving after 1 or 2 years, which has happened to UNC, Stanford, Michigan et al.