<p>please put yourself on a pedestal by calling everyone immature, it's really cool. I'm an 18 year old high school senior not a 50 year old parent.</p>
<p>Oh man this is hilarious.
1} couple of dorks that cant take a joke will be joining me.
2} couple of jocks that care only for "gurlz"</p>
<p>who's to judge whether a boy or girl is "hot"? and i'm pretty sure we're all superficial one way or another. but anyway, one might think some boy/girl looks like a freakin' bombshell while another might think he/she looks like the bottom of my foot... which is still pretty damn hot, if i may say so myself. ahem.</p>
<p>lol i got banned too haha</p>
<p>I think in lue of regular decision results, we should bump this post up. I'm getting sick of the other one.</p>
<p>Jensowak, Darwin to the rescue!
<a href="http://economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_NGQSTDJ%5B/url%5D">http://economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_NGQSTDJ</a></p>
<p>"GENTLEMEN may or may not prefer blondes. But, in rich countries at least, they do seem to prefer women with hour-glass figures. There have been various ideas about why this is so. The politically correct suggest that it is mere fashionand point to evidence that tastes are sometimes different in poorer societies. Those of a more biologically deterministic frame of mind suggest that wide hips, relative to waist size, are good for child bearing, and that large breasts deliver more milk. What has not been widely suggested is that women with classic figures are simply more fertile. But that is what Grazyna Jasienska and her colleagues at Harvard University hypothesise in the latest edition of the Proceedings of the Royal Society. They have found that in women of child-bearing age, the levels of two hormones known to be associated with fertility are, as it were, geometry-dependent."</p>
<p>"In the case of progesterone, both groups of narrow-waisted women had high hormone levels. In that of 17-b-oestrodiol, those with narrow waists and large breasts had elevated levelsand that level was particularly high at the time of ovulation. Indeed, it was so high that Dr Jasienska estimates such women are three times as likely as the others to become pregnant on any given occasion. In evolutionary terms that makes them very desirable mates indeed."</p>
<p>Next time the " politically correct suggest that it is mere fashionand point to evidence that tastes are sometimes different in poorer societies," horrify them with this.</p>
<p>MCD, 'big' words spelled incorrectly are worse than none at all.</p>