<p>"You said that Judaism wont even accept you unless your mother was Jewish."</p>
<p>When did i say that? Stop trying to "prove" I am aniti-semite! And Jews are an ethnic group, in addition to being a religion.</p>
<p>If you can question Wikipedia regarding Sharon, I can do the same with Wikipedia over Abbas and him being anti-semite or w/e.</p>
<p>Wikipedia has a reputation of being informative and accurate.</p>
<p>I said that Sharon was retaliating for Hamas attacks with rockets. By the way Hamas rockets are so crude that almost half blow up before landing. Come on Israel should use police forces to arrest terrorist and troublemakers. They dont need tanks and F16s. I am for Israel existence; however, I believe that Sharon has been tainting Israels image.</p>
<p>Seth Blue, I believe that the Republican Philosophy has continued to
alienate our allies-- France, Germany, Britain, Spain and countless others.
It is time for a resurging Democratic Party. We need to bring back our allies to the table in order to truly defeat the terrorists.</p>
<p>
[quote]
I said that Sharon was retaliating for Hamas attacks with rockets. By the way Hamas rockets are so crude that almost half blow up before landing. Come on Israel should use police forces to arrest terrorist and troublemakers. They dont need tanks and F16s. I am for Israel existence; however, I believe that Sharon has been tainting Israels image.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>They half blow up before they get there? How would you happen to know that? And Sharon doesn't retaliate with rockets. If there is a terrorist leader, he calls in a heli strike. Big difference. Do you realize how hard it is to find out the location of terrorist leaders, much less getting to them in time before they escape?</p>
<p>
[quote]
"You said that Judaism wont even accept you unless your mother was Jewish."</p>
<p>When did i say that? Stop trying to "prove" I am aniti-semite! And Jews are an ethnic group, in addition to being a religion.</p>
<p>If you can question Wikipedia regarding Sharon, I can do the same with Wikipedia over Abbas and him being anti-semite or w/e.</p>
<p>Wikipedia has a reputation of being informative and accurate.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>NO, wikipedia is completely user submitted info. If you wanted to you could go right a BS article. Now that ive looked some more, you seem to have missed the MOST IMPORTANT point:
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon%5B/url%5D">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon</a>
[quote]
Unit 101 undertook a series of retaliatory raids against Palestinians and neighboring Arab states that helped bolster Israeli morale and fortify its deterrent image. However, the unit was also criticized for targeting civilians as well as Arab soldiers, resulting in the widely condemned Qibya massacre in the fall of 1953, in which more than sixty Palestinian civilians were killed in an attack on their West Bank village. In the documentary "Israel and the Arabs: 50 Year War" Ariel Sharon recalls what happened after the raid, which was heavily condemned by many countries in the West, including the U.S.: I was summoned to see Ben-Gurion. It was the first time I met him. and right from the start Ben-Gurion said to me: "Let me first tell you one thing: it doesn't matter what the world says about Israel, it doesn't matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. And unless we show the Arabs that there is a high price to pay for murdering Jews, we won't survive."
[/quote]
Now please, you don't know, other than the name"massacre" what really happened. So like Arab propoganda outlets, slapping "massacre" on everything. </p>
<p>Not anti-semititc?
[quote]
Its pretty obvious that the Jews control most of the media here in America. No wonder why nobody hears the truth regarding Israel. I recommend BBC, since it does tell the truth and is not controlled by Jews.Tutle, prove us wrong with your research. The majority of media (esp top ones) are owned/influenced by Jews.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>
[quote]
most of this one-sided news influenced by wealth pro-Israeli Jews, what else can you expect
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I honestly recomennded you visit a neo-nazi site. Your views on Jewish control of the media, and the "Zionist conspiracy to control America" seem to coincide with theirs.</p>
<p>For the "mother is Jewish", I mixed you up with collegefreak87. My bad.</p>
<p>Really rollo? You think the democratic party needs to regain power? Goodluck with that. The democratic party is what I call the party that promulgates unrealism, which is why its support has been plummeting. At a time of war and crises, preemptive or not, people look up to the republicans.</p>
<p>Too bad they're the wrong party to look up to.</p>
<p>That's partial to individual opinion. What you said accounts for, well, not much. I suppose if you like a big government who distributes your hard earned money to those who haven't earned it, the liberals are your idols. I prefer giving to charity out of free will. </p>
<p>Besides, take a look at New Orleans.</p>
<p>Cheney's Halliburton
Stock Rose 3,281%
Executive Intelligence Review
10-12-5</p>
<p>(EIRNS) -- Halliburton stock options held by Dick Cheney rose 3,281% since October, 2004,according to figures compiled by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), reports rawstory website today. </p>
<p>The options were worth $241,498, now they are worth $8 million. </p>
<p>In a Sept. 15 statement, as Halliburton was getting no-bid contracts for repairs following Hurricane Katrina, Lautenberg said that Cheney should divest himself of these Halliburton holdings. </p>
<p>"Halliburton has already raked in more thant $10 billion from the Bush-Cheney administration for work in Iraq, and now they are being awarded some of the first Katrina contracts. It is unseemly for the Vice President to continue to benefit from this company at the same time his Administration funnels billions of dollars to it.''</p>
<p>T Is For Traitor
NeoCons, Meet
Your Accusers
By Douglas Herman
<a href="mailto:douglasherman7@yahoo.com">douglasherman7@yahoo.com</a>
Exclusive to Rense.com
10-9-5</p>
<p>"Treason. noun. Criminal act of betraying one's country as defined in Article II section 3 of the U.S. Constitution." </p>
<p>"They are the so-called neo-cons, or neo-conservatives. A compact group, almost all of whose members are Zionist. They hold the key positions in the Bush administration, as well as in the think-tanks that play an important role in formulating American policy and the ed-op pages of the influential newspapers." -Uri Avnery</p>
<p>Bin laden was killed at Tora Bora by the SF and 82nd Airborne. I don't believe that "excrement" is dead!! don't believe the hype.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/19/AR2005101902558.html%5B/url%5D">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/19/AR2005101902558.html</a>
<a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/101905Q.shtml%5B/url%5D">http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/101905Q.shtml</a></p>
<p>So, are these guys any better than terrorists or what? Time to hear the views of some CC nazis! Let your voice be heard, because I'm sure as hell you wont be able to do so in public!</p>
<p>Wait, you seem to not realize the distinctions of "acting on official army orders" and going "renegade." Just because some US soldiers went renegade does not mean that the US army as a whole represents them.</p>
<p>First paragraph of your article:
[quote]
The U.S. military said Wednesday it was investigating a report carried on an Australian television network that claimed American soldiers in Afghanistan burned the bodies of two Taliban fighters and then used the action to taunt other Islamic militants.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Obviously they are no better than terrorists. THats why there is an INVESTIGATION going on. No one is saying that they are better than terrorists except you.</p>
<p>Terrorism: The killing of innocent men, women and children, whether from a suicide bomber, or a tabacco chewing boy from texas dropping bombs from an F-16, If kids, women & the elderly die, they're terrorist.</p>
<p>Bin laden does not differentiate between civilian and military. In other words he is a psychopath.</p>
<p>Over 800 kenyans died due to his crimes. Why does this man have a following? I guess Africans don't deserve to live. Africans in Darfur- Sudan are being slaughtered by Bin Laden supporters.</p>
<p>Now the 82nd Airborne and SF are soldiers following the rules of war. They dont cut peoples heads off.</p>
<p>According to hardstyleprep's definition, someone who murders someone else is a terrorist.</p>
<p>Terrorist:
adj : characteristic of someone who employs terrorism (especially as a political weapon); "terrorist activity"; "terrorist state" n : a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities</p>
<p>Alienworkshop, those soldiers burned dead bodies, they do not purposefully target or kill civilians like Bin Laden and his supporters do. Its incredible that you even attempt to create such a connection between the two.</p>
<p>Oh and hardstyle, you STILL haven't anwsered the question.</p>
<p>
[quote]
those soldiers burned dead bodies
[/quote]
</p>
<p>They did it to intimidate other innocent Muslims in the area.</p>
<p>Majority of Americans realize that the war in Iraq is wrong. Cheneys illegal war will cost US taxpayers over $400 billion by 2007. Our allies were pushed aside ridiculed as old Europe etc.
We lost clout with our Arab allies Morocco, Mauretania, Turkey and others.
That said, American troops are some of the most professional in the world. They are not legislators; they are only following orders. The Uniform Code of Military Justice has harsh articles for soldiers who commit crimes. Moreover, we have the Office of the Inspector General that can shield soldiers who testify against offenders.</p>
<p>Everything in this world is not Black or white there is a lot of gray out there.</p>
<p>If you drop a 15,000 LB Bomb (MOAB) and you have calculated X number of civilian casualties like the Pentagon does (War Gaming), then you're just as bad as the Terrorist. When you use depleted Uranium Shells like we use in Iraq, knowing the residual effect will give civilians cancer and all types of mutated diseases, you're a Terrorist and nothing else. It's Ironic how we devalue 100,000 Iraqi civilian deaths under the guise we didn't intend to do it, ofcourse we did that's why The Pentagon estimates civilian deaths before launching this BS Iraq War based upon a pack of lies for Haliburton and the Texas Oil interest. The C Student doesn't give a F about our boys dying, limbless, crippled and hobbled for the rest of their lives. We hold so-called Terrorist for years without charges and torture prisoners like they did in Stalingrad or a Nazi holding camp. The Hypocrisy of our dumbest citizens that allow idiotic lying jerks like the Bush Administration tarnish our name and insult our beautiful Democracy, disrepected by the Pathetic C Student from Andover & Yale!</p>
<p>I dont blame Bush for all this mess, I blame all those who voted him into power in the first place.</p>