<p>I started this thread on the Columbia forum in order to get more views (and hopefully replies). Threads on the SAT/ACT forum accumulate too quickly. </p>
<p>Anyway... anyone would like to answer my question?
If your answer is a "yes," do you mind explaining why?</p>
<p>I’ll rephrase my question in order to clarify myself: Has anyone performed WAY better on the SAT than on the ACT and still got accepted to a top-tier school (like the ivies)?</p>
<p>Well, that wouldn’t be common anyway. They tend to get similar results. Getting a 2300 and a 28 would just be weird. Something else must have interfered. Even if that did happen, the ACT wouldn’t need to be sent, or vice-versa if the scores were switched.</p>
<p>If one performs better on the SAT than the ACT, then why would one send the ACT score anyway. Only at Penn where it does require to send all scores(SAT and ACT). Most students tend to perform better on the ACT vs the SAT. There are less than 400 students with perfect SAT(one sitting) vs less than 800 students with perfect ACT.</p>
<p>I actually had some tutoring for the SAT, yes, but the ACT was just horrible for me. It might be because I had been exposed more to the SAT prior to the test dates than the ACT. And also, I did not know anything in physics which might have affected my score.</p>