<p>He seems like a new guy teaching the class,</p>
<p>I was wondering if anyone knew of him.</p>
<p>I heard the class is pretty easy, but it seems many people did poorly with Wilkie.</p>
<p>On courserank, it seems Wilkie might be teaching so...</p>
<p>Does anyone know of this Panich guy?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Lee Panich? He was the head GSI when I took Anthro 2AC with Professor Lightfoot in Fall 2008. Can be kind of dry, but he knows his stuff.</p>
<p>How is he as far as grading wise?</p>
<p>I dunno. He wasn’t my GSI.</p>
<p>I didn’t like the class. Maybe you should take something else</p>
<p>I know…</p>
<p>Every other classes are pretty much full, so i don’t have much choice.
And i heard it’s pretty easy with Lightfoot, but it’s Panich who’s teaching, so
I was just w/d if anyone knew how he is about grade wise and teaching</p>
<p>I think it’s hard for anyone to really tell because this is the first time he will be teaching the class as a whole, since in previous years, he has only taught as a GSI in the class. </p>
<p>I took this class last semester with Wilkie and I didn’t particularly enjoy it.</p>
<p>Lightfoot usually teaches every other fall (He taught in Fall 2008, so most likely he will teach in Fall 2010). But there is no guarantee. </p>
<p>I actually enjoyed the stuff I learned; it’s just the way the class was set-up… If you’re interested in how things are excavated and drawing multiple lines of evidence from a single artifact, you’ll probably like the subject.</p>
<p>how did you do in the class</p>
<p>I got an A at the end, but I don’t really know how the grades worked out because I didn’t get my final back.</p>