<p>There is a lot of well-organized useful data in there, but last year the interface was nearly unusable.</p>
<p>nope. i’m in college and i don’t have that big of a desire to see them. plus, im sure hawkette will come out later with a statistical breakdown of all the data because she seems to get off on spending countless hours analyzing, mostly trivial, data.</p>
<p>I wouldn’t recommend it…</p>
<p>I mean, it’s great to check out “the best undergraduate biology program” and other specialty rankings for undergraduate institutions.</p>
<p>Let’s not feed the USNews ranking machine :D</p>
<p>I just wanted the rankings proper, no need to see the details of what shall be taken as Holy Writ</p>
<p>The only crucial information I see critical that is not listed on the “free version of USNews rankings” is the PA scores lol. Most other information I could probably extrapolate from Hawkette’s interpretations of the Common Data Set (CDS) forms each school reports annually each year.</p>
<p>wait, there’s now a ranking of best undergraduate biology programs?</p>
<p>That’s what I heard lol… I haven’t purchased the internet version so I cannot verify it for sure. I cannot comment… yet I did comment :P</p>
<p>I might. I’m kind of interested in the lowest/highest debt info. Besides that, it’s not really worth it.</p>
<p>Why should we buy the rankings? Ask on here and people will just give them to you</p>