<p>any possibility for a generous curve? lol. anything other than, say, each question being worth a point :cries:</p>
<p>yes. there have been many complaints specifically about the phases of mitosis and viscosity and why not all the information was given (in either a direct or indirect way)</p>
<p>i imagine that the curve will be better than usual.. it may start out as a -1 = 36 instead of it's normal -1 = 34 or 35</p>
<p>yay lol</p>
<p>the science was rediculous. and i was doing so well up until then...</p>
<p>me too lol</p>
<p>i have no guarantees on the curve.. it's all going to depend if enough people missed the same type of problems.. if the stats are no different overall from past ACT's, then the curve won't be much different (maybe slightly better, but it won't be anything drastic in that case)</p>
<p>i think though that enough people will have missed those problems and cause a change in the curve</p>
<p>I thought they pre-curved it, now?</p>
<p>no they don't.. it depends on how people do that take the test</p>
<p>that's one of the reasons why on the april test that the math section was a -1 = 36 and on the reading it was a -1 = 34</p>
<p>do you guys think the reading section for june will be -1 = 34? i thought it was easy.. too easy lol</p>
<p>What science score do you think a -6 would get me? Like a 28?</p>
<p>The science was so unfair -.-</p>
<p>when do we find out what exactly the curve is? do we wait until we get our test books back?
(sorry my first act)</p>
<p>I agree! I thought I was holding down a solid 35 composite until the science destroyed me.</p>
<p>-6 is normally a 27-28... it could be a 29 on this science maybe</p>
<p>i hope the reading curve is good.
i did terribly.
:(</p>
<p>I thought I did pretty good in science. I really hated that one with electricity though.</p>
<p>But on mitosis and everything else, that was so easy. But I'm just madly in love with Mitosis maybe... =/</p>