<p>I am really stressed right now since I think I am borderline 4/5. If I don't get a 5, then it has to be a really, really , really high 4. I calculated by scores from the lowest I think I could have gotten to the highest I think I got, and it ranges from 68 to 77. I think the general consensus is that it was easier than the 2003 exam, but still fairly hard. 2003 was a 66, and the others years were like 70. Was the curve for a 5 ever over a 70? I'm afraid I made some careless errors on the MC, and for the FRQ, for all 6 questions it was either 9 or 0 points. Most were 0. =( What do you guys think the curbve will be afor a 5? I'm guessing (and hoping) for a 68.</p>
<p>Yeesh. Pulling out my hair from this. If I get a 5 on BC next year, will colleges ignore my AB AP score? I’m not a bad calc student (have a 97) but I think that I didn’t have such a good test day.</p>
<p>The 1997 and 1998 curves, the two most recent curves released besides 2003, both required scores in the low 70’s for a 5.</p>
<p>I’d feel better if the 2008 curve were already released (it will be soon), but my estimate, given what I’ve seen of the FR and my student’s feelings about the MC difficulty is that the mark for a 5 will be really close to a 70.</p>