<p>
[QUOTE]
Some call the phenomenon that Zalasky's fighting "grade inflation" implying the boost is undeserved. Others say students are truly earning their better marks. Regardless, it's a trend that's been building for years and may only be accelerating: Many students are getting very good grades. So many, in fact, it is getting harder and harder for colleges to use grades as a measuring stick for applicants.
<p>This has been often discussed. It's way rank does matter and GPA matters only in context. For schools that don't rank, the colleges aproximate a rank.</p>
<p>This is why SATs are so important. In schools with 20 vals, SATs/ACTs are the only way to tell who is really smartest. It is also why SATIIs count for top privates and UCs because a person with an A who cannot break 600 goes to a school with grade inflation, unlike a B student who gets an 800.</p>
<p>well they are all in fresh/soph years and it comes out to be around a 3.7 UW cumulative GPA, which isn THAT bad...is it?</p>
<p>i was talking to my friend who goes to Harvard Westlake, a school comparable to exter or andover in LA, and he said a 3.7 gpa would probably be valedectorian.</p>