<p>Multiple choice were child’s play compared to the free response. Free response 1-4 were ok, 5 wouldn’t have been hard if I didn’t forget how to do logistic, and 6 was …??? For the last 2 parts</p>
<p>I felt really good about the exam. I felt the non-calculator MCQs were harder than the with-calculator ones. I actually don’t think I missed a single question on the calculator MCQ section. I felt the free-responses were very fair and pretty much what I expected. I loved number 6 ;)</p>
<p>Haha i spent WAY too much time on 1-4 because I basically forgot about the time limit. Then the proctor called 10 minutes and I completely freaked! Although I think I still got some points on the last one…maybe :)</p>
<p>Multiple choice were easy as always. The free responses were EXCELLENT. They required a bit of thought and were not simply the plug-and-chugs that you seem to see every year. (Well, except for #2, I’ve seen that exact variant 2 or 3 times with different scenarios and numbers and whatnot.) I must laud the test creators on free responses #3 and #6. They were different than what one normally sees in regards to those topics, but they weren’t difficult in my opinion.</p>
<p>I thought 4 was a nice one as well (if I remember the numbering correctly). They tend to keep the two topics they combined separate. Sucks not being able to talk about it lol.</p>
<p>The last two were difficult. The first four FRQs were great. I’m hoping I scored perfect or near perfect on each one. Multiple choice was meh-ish for me. There were 3 or 4 which I couldn’t figure out how to do on the non-calculator and 2 or 3 on the calculator sections.</p>
<p>My whole class felt clueless about the last two, but I answered a few of the parts hoping to get partial credit. I hope I got it…</p>
<p>I just put in random values in score calculator. If my predictions/hopes are correct, I barely made a 5. Pleaseeeeeeeee god!!!</p>
<p>FRQ: #1 and #2 were complete jokes, so easy. #3-#4 were slightly harder but still easy. #5 got kinda tricky i probably missed half of that one. #6, first part was easy, lots of points there. Last two parts i didn’t even really answer cause i knew i was so wrong.</p>
<p>calc bc test was the biggest joke lol. MC was extremely easy and the FRQ was extremely standard. 1-5 were easy and 6 a b c were easy only the last part required a little thinking (not really if you know a certain formula).
Hopefully perfect on the FRQ but you don’t really get anything out of doing well past a 5 haha.</p>
<p>I didn’t find the MC particularly difficult. I made some epic fail mistakes that I corrected on the calculator portion of the FR. I think I may have given away the most points on number six because of something I should have clarified with myself before the exam (I can’t say what that is right now).</p>
<p>MC was easy?
I felt MC was more difficult than free-response, but I did two sets of free-response last night, so maybe I felt more comfortable with them. I also made some careless mistakes on the MC that took me a while to realize, which probably frustrated me.</p>
<p>I did struggle with 6d though. And I think I did 6c wrong as well 'cause I didn’t spend more than 1min on it, so I feel like I missed something.</p>
<p>I felt the exact opposite. I found the MC especially the noncalculator part quite challenging and I ran out of time…
FRQs were so much easier except for #6 last question which I had no clue</p>
<p>MethodicSquirrel,
NO.5 of frq was logistic??? are you sure…</p>
<p>I thought that the mc was harder than usual, but the free response (even question 6) was easier than any of the old free responses from released exams</p>
<p>The MC I thought was quite easy (but I felt the questions looked harder than they were). The FRQ was on par with the ones from the last couple of years. I found number 6 tricky but it was a good problem and definitely doable. There was one part of four though that the wording drove me crazy cuz I would be right unless they were asking for something else which we can’t do. I think 3 was the AB BC mix problem and 6 and 1? Were BC only. 5 I thought was pretty straightforward.</p>
<p>Oh and 1 was pretty standard although I wasnt pleased with some of those decimals. Same for 2. Everything followed the format. I laughed at part a of number 3 - it’s not what you would expect them to ask.</p>
<h1>5 Was NOT logistic. As long as you employed normal techniques for integration of seperable differential equations/implicit differentiation you were fine.</h1>