<p>That was hard. Anyone else think so? MC wasn't bad but FR sucked, for the most part!</p>
<p>It was brutal.</p>
<p>I’m not sure how 20% of students got a 5 last year!!! That is way higher than APUSH’s 11%, and APUSH in general is an easier course.</p>
<p>The MC was easier for me than I expected. I felt that this exam focused on material characteristics (flame test, solubility, etc.). I had studied the flame test materials and solubility rules the night before, which subsequently lightened the burden during test day. I felt that the more conceptual questions on the FR were easy, but some of the calculations were a puzzle for me. Also, I feel that Princeton Review 2011 was not an accurate display of the test.</p>
<p>The MC was not as bad as I thought it was going to be , but Free response was … >.> Part B was okay but Part A…</p>
<p>I just have a quick question. Are we allowed to say if the test was easy or hard or do we have to wait 48 hours…or is the 48 hours for the actual material on the test? Thanks</p>
<p>Really? Part A of the FR was hard? I found that and the MC to be easy. Then I got dogged by Part B. I don’t know if I was just tired of thinking or what, but it was just rough.</p>