<p>my teacher said that the FRQ for this year will be acid or base for the 1st problem.</p>
<p>that’s a pretty decent prediction.</p>
<p>Part A</p>
<p>Acid/Base Equilibrium
Thermo
Electro</p>
<p>Part B</p>
<p>Reactions
Bonding
?</p>
<p>My guesses</p>
<p>Considering there is always a problem on equilibrium that is probably true.</p>
<p>Yeah, especially since there was a Kp problem last year and usually it’s an acid base problem.</p>
<p>There was an orgo one last year too…which is weird since they don’t test orgo that much.<br>
I’m predicting a rate law problem around like problem 3 or so too.</p>
<p>^ it wasn’t really an orgo question, it was testing your knowledge on intermolecular forces, intramolecular forces, etc. it just so happened that the molecules in question were organic molecules. so don’t freak out about it.</p>
<p>Can you guys be more specific about the acid base equilibrium? You mean Ka, Kb, but what about titration and buffers?</p>
<p>Is there any way to predict the labs? =/</p>
<p>I wouldn’t be surprised if it were partial pressure for equilibrium.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.apcentral.collegeboard.com%5B/url%5D”>www.apcentral.collegeboard.com</a> … i think you should look at the questions if you don’t know what the standard acid/base equilibrium question looks like.</p>
<p>last year was the hydrate lab… so don’t expect that one.</p>
<p>Each number pertains to a certain skill</p>
<p>I hope it goes you said jamesford. Thermo and electro are my favorite areas.</p>
<p>well, there’s always an electrochem question. at least there always has been one in the past few years.</p>
<p>I actually want something to do with gasses for the first section.</p>
<p>I’d be thrilled with bonding and periodic trends for the second section.</p>
<p>I heard that there was some kind of rate problem added to the AP curriculum this year? Is this accurate? It it were the case, it would probably appear on the tests.</p>
<p>well i had a rate problem on my exam last year… i thought that has always been in the curriculum.</p>
<p>It was some specific kind of rate calculation that had been omitted from the test in the past, I think. Maybe she is behind the times, I don’t know.</p>