<p>is the test really hard or something?
if i get all of the MC right and half the FRQ wrong, can i get at least a 4?</p>
<p>all MC and half FRQ should get you to a 5.
according to PR there are about 90 pts total (weighted of course), and MC all correct would give you 60 pts. and you need about 70-ish for a 5, to be safe.
I doubt many people, if any, get all the MC correct though.</p>
<p>I think the MC is MUCH harder than the FR</p>
<p>But that's just my judgement.</p>
<p>what book is everyone using. I started reading essentials of economics but I feel like that is just an overview. Are there any good only sites?</p>
<p>My textbook is Economics Today by Roger Leroy Miller, and I'm using Princeton Review to study (I ordered Barrons from Amazon also, but they had some problem and didn't have it or something).
My textbook has nothing on Nash Equlilbrium though, although it covered everything else pretty well.</p>
<p>You can't rely on the pass rate for accurate gauges of a test's difficulty. Calc BC has 44% of takers get 5, Physics C: E&M has about 30%.</p>
<p>Whoa 44%? It's only 21% for AB. That's so unfair...</p>
<p>Well since AB is pretty much a prerequisite for BC, I don't think people who get 1 or 2s on the AB exam will even take the BC class, so its mostly the people who do well on the AB exam and class who go on to take Calc BC, thus the higher percentage of higher scores.</p>