My daughter is a Junior who has completed 5 APs in her freshman and sophomore years. This year she is taking 5 more APs that mostly represent humanities. Next year she is planning to take another 7-8 APs. She is not a fan of math and science and has put most of her energy into politics. She intends to apply SCEA next year.
Her high school offers AP Physics (no Honors Physics) and AP Calculus. One of the great joys of her life has been the glee that she doesn’t have to take these classes. However, I see that Physics is listed as a suggested core science on Harvard’s recommended HS coursework and I have seen a few debates on needing AP Calculus (if offered at your HS) as well.
Is there a reason for non-STEM majors to take these? Are all Harvard students required to take Calculus and Physics once admitted? Or can the government students pursue other interests? Before I recommend to my daughter to rethink her senior plan with courses she feels she will struggle with (Aka hate), I’d like to learn more.
Can’t you argue that a student checks the box of most rigorous course load if the student has the highest UW and W GPA out of 420 in her graduating class? Her argument has been, “Aren’t 18 AP classes enough to show rigor??”
Btw she intends to take AP Environmental Science, AP Stats, AP Micro/Macro Economics and a few others that would more than fulfill 4 years of math and science. She’s taken AP Bio and is taking AP Chem.
Thanks