<p>Necesito ayuda en estas dos preguntas…</p>
<li>El acn</li>
</ol>
<p>i'm just taking a guess...</p>
<ol>
<li>c</li>
<li>d (not sure)</li>
</ol>
<p>its c for the first one and b for the second one
hey but shouldnt it say mas embarazoso? on the first one..
im spanish btw</p>
<p>o right, indirect object b4 direct object</p>
<p>Me equivoqu</p>
<p>because the "for" is included in esperar, just like with buscar, for example. And, for the record, you would use "por".</p>
<p>are you sure I would use "esperar por..." and not "esperar al..."?
That's not what it says on this website:
3. Esperar/ to wait for
<a href="http://www.businessspanish.com/LECCION/Prepositions.htm%5B/url%5D">http://www.businessspanish.com/LECCION/Prepositions.htm</a></p>
<p>I meant, you wouldn't have any modifier, just "esperar". But just that "por" would be more appropriate if it would be used in that situation (which it isn't). Like your definition says, the "for" is included in esperar, so none is necessary.</p>