hi all:
first off, i’m a new user to this site, so apologies if this is the wrong place to post this. i’ve been browsing through a lot of these chanceme threads, and i’m noticing discrepancies between testing scores and gpa for a lot of applicants. some of these students are 4.0 UW students and seem to do amazing in school, but their testing scores just feel… off to me. take this student: 4.04 UW gpa, 4.89 W, but his SAT subject scores are all mostly below 750, and SAT I math score was below 700. where I go to school, even the non-honors math students easily go 750+ on the math section. i see these kind of stats in other threads as well, and frankly they’re surprising, as the 4.0 students i spend my time around are also virtually perfect standardized testing students. the only explanation i can come up with here is that courses are just generally easier to succeed in outside my school.
and it got me to thinking, since a 4.0 UW at my school is relatively rare, how much do colleges really factor in the difficulty of your high school into your gpa into their holistic review? I myself have a 3.93 UW GPA, which might be passable, but my school is not a magnet school: it’s just a public school with an API of 10/10. yes, it is a top 100 school in the united states, but the effect the some of the extremely difficult courses have had on my gpa is negative, even if they have prepared my for testing very well. do colleges even consider school API, or do they just look at ranking? because as far as i know, my school does not provide an actual ranking system.
this post isn’t very organized, i understand, but what do you all feel on how much colleges consider high school difficulty?