<p>1) Don't some FA types resent the fact that you're not pleased with what their institution has offered ... or have they come to expect it?
It's their job to work with you on financial aid, and your right to discuss your concerns with them. Maybe its my legal background, but the idea that anyone would refrain from communicating dissatisfaction with an insufficient award simply for fear of offense seems rather silly. That being said, you should of course be polite and respectful in communications, bearing in mind the time constraints the staff is under -- I mean, appealing is one thing -- screaming, name-calling, or demanding instant results would be quite another. (I'm sure they very much resent callers who are angry or rude, and very much appreciate appealers who say "please" and "thank you") </p>
<p>2) Is this like buying a car in that you go back and fourth ad nauseum and then meet somewhere in the middle.. or should you take the first response to your appeal, as it will more than likely be their last? </p>
<p>No -- generally they have set rules and procedures and work within those. If, for example, they want you to document unusual medical expenses, then you will send the documentation (copies of medical bills, etc.) and they will review it once, and then let you know if they are increasing their award. </p>
<p>3) Must you have leverage to do this, for instance, a better offer from a competing school.. or can you just make the case that you cannot afford the FA package as offered? </p>
<p>Each college has its own policy; some will look at offers from competing schools, some won't. The best thing to do is to start by contacting the financial aid office to find out what they will consider.</p>
<p>Examples: (a) My d. appealed an award from NYU, in person. She had copies of awards from other colleges in a folder I had given her, but NYU explicitly says it is not interested in those. NYU isn't interested in hearing about personal expenses either -- they politely told her at the outset that she should simply "appeal" and that within 2 days they would get back to her, and she could expect an increase of about $1000 at most --which is exactly what she got.</p>
<p>This is pretty much how NYU works -- most people who start with a grant in the range of $8000-$10000 and who "appeal" (no reasons need be given) get an additional $1000, in some cases $2000 in grant money -- and that's it.</p>
<p>(b) My d. actually attends Barnard. Our financial situation is complicated, so each year I ask to discuss the award with a financial aid rep and go over all my questions and concerns. Barnard is a 100% need school that is very formulaic about their policies, but there are enough complications that open discussion can lead to areas where the grant may be improved. For example, this past year it turned out that Barnard had not considered the fact that I was making payments on a PLUS loan for my older son, who was no longer a dependent; they told me that if I could document my payments as part of a request for reconsideration, they would recalculate our EFC & increase the grant, and they did -- essentially by subtracting the amount of required payments from my income. </p>
<p>4) Is there any reason to be optimistic in competitive areas, (as in our case the northeast)..lots of applicants =seller's market? Colleges want students, and the job of everyone in the financial aid office is to give away money -- or , more appropriately, to support the admissions office by structuring awards that will mean that admissions decisions will be effectuated. In other words, the admissions office says who it wants -- the financial aid office makes that happen, in a budget-conscious way. At many colleges, the admissions office may also tell the financial aid office how much it wants particular students, resulting in aid awards structured in a way to favor the students who are in the "most-wanted" categories.</p>