<p>Guys, I need some advice, I am really confused with what to do with my applications. I'm applying both to the UK and to the US, but I have not done my US applications yet. I have an offer from UCL for deferred entry 2010 (compulsory military service), but I've been rejected by LSE. I'm doing the IB and I have Mock-exams (all of the syllabus in most subjects) starting on Monday, continuing until my possible Oxford interviews (I'll be in the UK 9th-13th Dec) and on the 16th, I leave to Thailand for two weeks.</p>
<p>My problem is this: I have to finish my US applications by the 31st of December, but I also have to prepare for my possible Oxford interview, and also study for the mocks. These mocks don't matter at all to UK unis, but they will show on my US transcripts. </p>
<p>My SAT I scores are not exactly great (CR640, M720, WR650(essay:6)), but I'm 100% Finnish so my CR/WR scores might be under less pressure. However, I did much better on the SAT II tests (770 Math II, 790 Physics, 680 French). My ECs are excellent (chairman of nationwide IB student union), my class rank is 1, my grades great (predicted 43-45/45 IB in rigorous subjects with 4 at HL) and my references stellar.</p>
<p>So my options at the moment are:
1) Do as I originally planned, i.e. apply to the US now => Means studying for the mocks, and writing my US essays in a huge rush. (Also, not preparing that much for the possible Oxford interview, which is academic unlike the US interviews.)
2) No application to the US this year => Means no need to write essays nor study for the mocks. (Will have plenty of time to prepare for Oxford.) If rejected by Oxford, I can apply to the US next year, since my UCL offer is for deferred entry. However, I cannot reapply to Oxford and LSE without rescinding my offer from UCL.</p>
<p>I'm applying for Harvard, Yale, Princeton and MIT. I would choose HYPM over UCL and LSE, but Oxford is my favourite.</p>