April 2011 ACT Math Discussion

<p>Stop assuming things and learn that you can’t perceive emotion, tone, or attitude through text on the Internet. In no way did I mean to come across as condescending… we are, in fact, walking you through this problem, considering we’re having to provide various ways of explaining the same thing and have even resorted to third-party resources to help you see the issue.</p>

<p>I don’t know who crapped in your cereal this morning, but it doesn’t make it okay to put words into my mouth and go off on these wild, flamboyant tangents about something that is totally untrue.</p>

<p>P.S., I’m not sure if you’re extremely paranoid or just like creating unnecessary drama and such, but in either case, it might be something worth getting checked out or working on.</p>

<p>when you wrote "thank you " at the end of your post, you sounded like a smart ass</p>

<p>Good thing I didn’t write that then, huh? Not sure what that has to do with anything you or I have said so far though.</p>

<p>i wasn’t talking about you personally, i meant that to the azimaz guy… 3rd person you if you catch my drift lol
i think she addressed the wrong person</p>

<p>so…how bout those graphs?</p>

<p>they blew ass like this whole test</p>

<p>Log b (1/81) = -4</p>

<p>Anyone get this?</p>

<p>I know the answers were like…</p>

<p>3
9
(1/3)
(1/9)</p>

<p>something like that</p>

<p>I guessed 3</p>

<p>Yeah, you’re right, I need a psychiatric evaluation. Good call. Way to edit your post with even more condescending comments that are practically calling me crazy. I’m out.</p>

<p>@khh 3</p>

<p>3^-4 = 1/81</p>

<p>Yeah, since I’m so condescending and rude according to the ultimate judge (didn’t know it was quite time for that yet), I figured the least I could do is offer some advice.</p>

<p>Peace.</p>

<p>Let us calm our panties and look across the lake with Jamal.</p>

<p>That being said, was 47 the second choice in that question?</p>

<p>47 was B, i used the law of sines and it worked out</p>

<p>Anybody else laugh out loud on the “you must be 4 feet tall to ride the ride” question?</p>

<p>Actually, you must be <em>more than</em> 4 feet tall to ride the rollercoaster ;)</p>

<p>Ah yes, and luckily Jose, or whatever his name was, rode the ride and he was MORE THAN 4 feet tall.</p>

<p>I actually was taken back by the rollercoaster question and spent about a minute on it just trying to figure out if i was just not noticing a part of the question or something because i thought that it was too easy to actually be a question</p>

<p>I love the ridiculous names on the ACT</p>

<p>@soccersr dude I double checked by turning my test booklet upside down to see if it was a right triangle… and the top angle was def less than 90, and when I checked that BAC looked very similar to a 45 degree angle.</p>

<p>PLUS, I used law of cosines to check it.</p>

<p>that was more of a logic/iq based question</p>

<p>shizz missed one question…
looks like a 35 :(</p>